multiplicity of suits - definitie. Wat is multiplicity of suits
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

Wat (wie) is multiplicity of suits - definitie


multiplicity of suits         
n. several actual or potential lawsuits which should be joined together in one suit and one trial. It is a basic principle of law that multiplicity is to be avoided when possible, practical and fair. Example: several suits are filed by different people against the same person or entity, based on the same set of facts and the same legal issues. On motion of either party or by the judge's own determination, the judge can order the cases consolidated.
Multiplicity of suits         
Multiplicity of suits is a term to describe when more than one lawsuit exists regarding the same transaction or occurrence. The law generally attempts to avoid this situation and there are several rules in place when such situations occur.
Multiplicity         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Multiplicity (disambiguation)
·noun The quality of being multiple, manifold, or various; a state of being many; a multitude; as, a multiplicity of thoughts or objects.

Wikipedia

Multiplicity of suits

Multiplicity of suits is a term to describe when more than one lawsuit exists regarding the same transaction or occurrence. The law generally attempts to avoid this situation and there are several rules in place when such situations occur. The main risk with several lawsuits over the same subject matter is that the different lawsuits may result in clearly contradictory results.

For example, a litigant is injured when crossing a bridge in Ottawa, Ontario, joining it to Hull, Quebec due to defects in the roadway. This could result in a lawsuit against the city of Ottawa, the city of Hull, the province of Ontario, the province of Quebec, and even the federal government of Canada. However, court rules often require governments to be sued in their own courts. This situation would require three different lawsuits - one in Ontario, one in Quebec, and one in the Federal Court of Canada. As such, usually one court will accept jurisdiction over the entire matter, and any proceedings or attempt to remove it to the other court will be stayed.

In addition, courts discourage more than one lawsuit being started between the same parties in the same dispute. For example, in a business dispute, if new causes of action arise out of the same problem (for example, ongoing patent infringement), the court will generally require new allegations to be brought into the existing lawsuit rather than allowing a new lawsuit to be started.